Latent photoactivatable precatalysts for metathesis polymerization

ABSTRACT

Latent photoactivatable precatalysts are provided for metathesis polymerization and has the general formula (Ru(NHC) n (X 1 ) m (L) 0   p+ ((X 2 ) − ) p . Wherein NHC is an N-heterocyclic carbene, n=1 or 2; X 1  is a C1-C 18  mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid or trifluoromethane sulfate; X 2  is a C1-C 18  mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid, trifluoromethane sulfate, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, or hexafluoroantimonate; m=0, 1, or 2 and L=a C 4 -C 18  carbolic acid nitrile or a C 4 -C 18  carbolic acid di or trinitrile; o=6−n−m or 5−n−m and p=2−m.

The invention relates to photoactivatable, latent catalyists, which can be especially used for modifying surfaces by means of metathesis polymerization.

The term metathesis polymerization comprises the Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerizations (ROMP), the Acyclic Diene Metathesis (ADMET) Polymerization, the 1-alkine polymerization, and the cyclopolymerization of 1,6-heptadiines.

All of these metathesis polymerizations have the common feature that they are catalyzed by Fischer-respectively Schrock-type metal carbene complexes. Such metal carbene complexes may be components of the catalyst system in the form of defined bonds, or they can be generated in situ by a process preceding the polymerization.

Where the metal carbene complexes are components of the catalyst system they can produce either intrinsic or latent activities.

In the first case, no activation will be needed; in the latter an activating stage is necessary. Such an activating stage may be induced thermally, i.e. by increasing the temperature, or photochemically, by exposure to radiation, for instance.

Alternatively, you can use precatalysts which will not generate polymerization active transition metal carbenes until they have contact with the monomer and/or by adding appropriate reagents and/or by external activation.

External activation may include a photochemical (UV-Vis light) or thermal process (heating). Precatalysts which in the presence of monomers need an external stimulus to become polymerization active, by either increasing the temperature or by radiation with UV or visible light, are called latent precatalysts.

The present state of the art knows a number of systems for the production of photochemically activatable precatalysts for metathesis polymerization, such as the Ru(II) and Os(II) complexes [Ru(p-cymene)Cl₂(PR₃)], [Os(p-cymene)Cl₂(PCy₃)]5 (Cy=cyclohexyl), [RuCl₂(PCy₃)(p-cymene)], [Ru(arene)₆X₂], [Ru(L)₆ (X″)₂] (L=H₂O, acetonitrile, propionitrile; X′=tosylate, trifluoromethane sulfate, chloride; arene=benzene, toluene, hexamethylbenzene, p-cymene), [Ru(arene)Cl₂(L)2] (arene=benzene; L=picoline); [RuCl₂(IMes)(p-cymene)], [RuCl₂(IMesH₂)(p-cymene)], (IMes=1,3-dimesitylimidazol-2-ylidene, IMesH₂=1,3-dimesitylimidazolin-2-ylidene).

A general problem of all existing, “latent”, photochemically activatable latent catalysts and precatalysts for metathesis polymerization is the fact that they show an intrinsic metathesis polymerization activity in the absence of light or UV light. This means that mixtures made of a monomer and a latent catalyst or precatalyst will not be thermally stable and polymerization will occur at ambient temperature, sometimes very slowly, even without the influence of light and without any heating of the catalyst or precatalyst/monomer mixture. You can say that these systems show a latent behaviour which is at least very limited if they show any at all.

It is the goal of the present invention to provide a latent precatalyst system which ensures that all of these difficulties are avoided. It is, furthermore, on the one hand, the goal of the invention to provide a procedure which facilitates the easy and fast photochemical generation of polymer layers by means of metathesis polymerization, and, on the other hand, to provide generally latent precatalysts for metathesis reactions, such as the ring-opening metathesis polymerization, or the Acyclic Diene Metathesis (ADMET) Polymerization.

This requirement of the invention regarding such a latent precatalyst system is met by the characteristics of claim 1.

The essential requirement of the invention is that the latent precatalyst system of the invention results from the general formula

Ru(NHC)_(n)(X¹)_(m)(L)_(o) ^(p+)((X²)′)_(P)

wherein NHC is an N-heterocyclic carbene, n=1 or 2; X¹ is a C1-C₁₈ mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid or trifluoromethane sulfate; X² is a C1-C₁₈ mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid, trifluoromethane sulfate, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, or hexafluoroantimonate; m=0, 1 or 2 and L=a C₄-C₁₈ carbolic acid nitrile or a C₄-C₁₈ carbolic acid di- or trinitrile; o=6−n−m or 5−n−m and p=2−m.

The Subclaims 2 through 3 refer to some advantageous embodiments of the latent catalyst system of the invention, but not limiting it in any conclusive way.

Preference is given to the use of cationic Ru(II) complexes (p=2−m) with tert-butylnitrile ligands (L) and trifluoracetate ligands (X¹═X²═CF₃COO′), but not exclusively.

Furthermore, the requirement of the invention is met by a procedure to modify surfaces or to functionalize surfaces with metathesis polymerization in accordance with the characteristics of Claim 4.

“Modification” or “functionalization” within the meaning of the invention is the grafting of monomer bonds on to the surface by way of a polymerization process or the application of polymer layers from such monomer bonds on to the surface.

“Latent” within the meaning of the invention is the fact that the precatalyst does not show any significant polymerization activity in the presence of the monomer and the absence of light <350 nm up to a temperature of 40° C. within a period of 2 hours (<10% conversion).

“Photoactivatable” within the meaning of the invention is the quality that a mixture from monomer and precatalyst can be activated, i.e. induced to polymerize with UV light <350 nm, preferably UV light of 254 nm.

The Subclaims 5 through 7 refer to some advantageous embodiments of the procedure of the invention, but not limiting the procedure in any conclusive way.

In the following please find some examples of especially favorable embodiments of the invention without however limiting the invention in any way.

EXPERIMENTAL INFORMATION A.1 General

All experiments were carried out in a glovebox (MBraun LabMaster 130) or in a Schlenk line under an N2 atmosphere.

Commercial materials were used without further cleaning.

Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and dichlorethane were distilled off of sodium/benzophenone and/or CaH2.

Pentane, diethyl ether, toluol, and methylenechloride were dried with an MBraun SPS System.

The ′H-NMR spectres were recorded by a Bruker Spectrospin 250 at 250.13 MHz, the ¹³C-NMR spectres at 62.90 MHz in the indicated solvent at 25° C. and are indicated in the dimension “parts per million (ppm)” relative to tetramethylsilane.

The coupling constant quantities are indicated in Hz.

The IR spectres were recorded by means of ATR technology by a Bruker Vector 22.

The molecular weights and polydispersity indices (PDIs) of the polymers were determined by GPC at 30° C. on PLgel 10 μm MIXED-B, 7.5×300 mm columns (Polymer Laboratories) in THF at 25° C. with a Waters autosampler, a Waters 484 UV detector (254 nm), an Optilab Rex RI detector (Wyatt) and a MiniDawn light scattering detector (Wyatt).

The water contact angle measurements were performed on corresponding equipment made by the company Krüss GmbH (Germany).

A.2 Reagents and Standards

[Ru(CF₃CO₂)₂(p-cymene)(IMesH₂)], [Ru(CF₃CO₂)₂(p-cymene)(IMes)], exo, exo-2,3-di-(pentoxymethyl)norbornen, exo, exo-N,N-(Norborn-5-ene-2,3-dicarbimido)-L-valinethylester, exo, exo-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-en-2,3-dicarbolic acid dibenzylester, and (N-benzyl)-5-norbornen-exo-2,3-dicarboximide were produced in the usual manner.

The purity of all bonds was verified by means of NMR.

FIG. 1 is a summarized overview of the used monomers and the structures of PI-1 and PI-2

A.3 Syntheses A.3.1

[Ru(CF₃CO₂)₂(NCC(CH₃)₃)₄(IMesH₂)] (PI-1): (700 mg, 0.91 mmol) [Ru(CF₃CO₂)₂ (IMesH₂)(p-cymene)] were suspended in 5 mL absolute trimethylacetonitrile. The mixture was heated up to 90° C. for 12 hours. After cooling to ambient temperature, all volatile elements of the vacuum were removed, and the residue washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum. Yield:

600 mg (92%). λ_(max)<=230 nm; ¹HNMR (CDCl₃): δ 6.95 (s, 4H), 3.89 (s, 4H); 2.31 (s, 18H); 1.27 (s, 36H). ¹³CNMR (CDCl₃): δ 207.1, 161.5 (q, CO, ²J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=34 Hz), 160.4 (q, CO, ²J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=32 Hz), 138.2, 138.1, 136.1, 130.5, 129.4, 117.6 [q, CF₃, ¹J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=299 Hz], 115.7 [q, CF₃, ¹J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=293.8 Hz], 52.6, 29.9, 27.8, 21.1, 17.9. IR (ATR): 2975.5 (w), 1691.7 (s), 1473.6 (m), 1372.7 (m), 1247.5 (m), 1192.2 (m), 1115.1 (m), 719.8 (w).

Elementary analysis prepared for C₄₅H₆₂F₆N₆O₄Ru (M_(r)=966.07) C, 55.95; H, 6.47; N, 8.70.

found: C, 55.63; H, 6.37; N, 8.50.

A.3.2

[Ru(CF₃CO₂)₂(NCC(CH₃)₃)₄(IMes)] (PI-2): The compound was produced, in an analogue way as for PI-1, from [Ru(CF₃CO₂)₂ (IMes)(p-cymene)] (500 mg, 0.65 mmol) and 5 mL absolute trimethylacetonitrile.

Yield:

400 mg (85%). λ_(max)=255 nm; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.01 (s, 4H), 6.93 (s, 2H); 2.38 (s, 6H); 2.10 (s, 12H); 1.27 (s, 36H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 175.4, 161.8 (q, CO, ²J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=34.1 Hz), 160.6 (q, CO, ²J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=32 Hz), 139.3, 137.6, 135.8, 130.7, 129.1, 128.5, 117.7 [q, CF₃, ¹J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=298.2 Hz], 115.7 [q, CF₃, ¹J(¹⁹F, ¹³C)=293.6 Hz], 30.1, 28.0, 21.3, 17.9. IR (ATR): 2975.7 (w), 1689.9 (s), 1471.9 (m), 1396.2 (m), 1304.7 (m), 1192.2 (m), 1116.5 (m), 711.4 (w).

A.3.3

Typical solution polymerization: PI-1 (4 mg, 4×10⁻³ mmol) and the monomer (1.0 mmol) were solved in 5 ml CDCI₃ and supplied into a quartz Schlenk tube. The mixture was exposed to radiation for 60 minutes, while stirring (254 nm, 90 J/cm²). The polymer solution was poured onto methanol and the polymer filtered off. After washing with methanol and pentane, the polymer was dried at 40° C. under vacuum.

A.3.4

Typical surface modification with photo-induced ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP): A solution of PI-1 (4 mg, 4×10⁻³ mmol) in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzenel (5 mL) and dicyclopentadiene (60.0 mg, 1 mmol) was applied to glass, for instance, by means of an appropriate application system (doctor blade), spread to a wet thickness of ca. 5 μm, and exposed to UV light radiation (254 nm, 1.5 J/cm²). Such exposure may by choice be performed through a screen. After 1 min, the polymer layer was washed with methylene chloride and dried afterwards.

Water contact angle measurements resulted in a contact angle of 95.5°, which is strongly deviating from that of the native glass surface)(50.7°.

A.3.5

Typical surface functionalization with photo-induced ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP): In a silanizing step, glass panes were initially pre-functionalized with norbornene groups. Such a pre-functionalization was achieved by storing the glass panes for 1 hour in ethanolic caustic potash solution, rinsing with water and acetone afterwards, drying (for 10 min at 90° C.) and finally storing in a solution of chlorodimethyl silyle norobornene (10 wt. %) for 1 hour.

Prior to any further coating, the glass panes were washed with acetone and dried at 45° C. A solution of PI-1 (4 mg, 4×10⁻³ mmol) in 1,2,4-trichlorebenzene (5 mL) and dicyclopentadiene (60.0 mg, 1 mmol) were applied to a norbornene-modified glass pane by means of an appropriate application system. The layer was spread to a wet thickness of ca. 1 μm and exposed to UV light radiation (254 nm, 1.5 J/cm²). Such exposure may by choice be performed through a screen. After 1 min, the polymer layer was washed with methylene chloride and dried afterwards.

A.4 Summary of the Polymerization Results in Solution:

TABLE 1 Polymerization results for the monomers 3-8 with PI-1 and PI-2 and radiation at 308 and/or 254 nm. Yield _([a]) Yield _([a]) M ^(n) /PDl _([a]) cis (%) PI Monomer 308 nm 254 nm 254 nm 254 nm 1 exo, exo-3   40 _([b])   95 _([b]) 4.8 × 10 ₅ /1.8 61 1 4 82 99 — — 1 exo-5 69 85 2.1 × 10 ₅ /1.8 53 1 exo-6 90 92 8.8 × 10 ₅ /1.92 52 1 exo, exo-1  <5 _([b]) 90 2.6 × 10 ₅ /3.7 49 1 8   33 _([b])   99 _([b]) 40,000/1.2 — 2 exo, exo-3   41 _([b])   92 _([b]) — 61 2 4 >99 99 — — 2 exo-5 61 61 4 × 4 × 10 ₅ /2.45 51 2 exo-6 91 90 8.8 × 10 ₅ /2.0 48 2 exo, exo-1  <5 _([b]) 86 4.5 × 10 ₅ /4.53 43 2 8 21 _([) _(b) _(]) >99 _([b]) 49,000/1.8 — _([a]) in 5 ml CDCI3, monomer: precatalyst ratio = 200:1, 30° C./1h, isolated yield in %; _([b]) in 5 ml CDCI3, monomer: precatalyst ratio = 200:1, 30° C./1h, yield determined by means of ₁ H-NMR.

Poly(exo-3)₂₀₀ produced with PI-1: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 5.27˜5.17 (m, 2H); 3.85 (br, s, 8H); 2.67 (br, s, 1H); 2.34 (br, s, 1H); 1.96 (br, s, 3H); 1.55 (br, s, 4H); 1.32 (br, s, 9H); 0.90 (br, s, 6H). M_(n): 48000, polydispersity (PDI): 1.8.

Poly(exo-3)₂₀₀ produced with PI-2: ¹HNMR (CDCl₃): δ 5.27˜5.17 (m, 2H); 3.85 (br, s, 8H); 2.67 (br, s, 1H); 2.34 (br, s, 1H); 1.96 (br, s, 3H); 1.55 (br, s, 4H); 1.32 (br, s, 9H); 0.90 (br, s, 6H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 133.9 (m), 71.0, 70.6, 62.1, 47.6˜45.0 (m), 41.0, 39.0, 29.5, 28.5, 22.5, 14.

Poly(exo-5)₂₀₀ produced with PI-1: ¹HNMR (CDCl₃): δ 5.75-5.50 (m, 2H); 4.29˜4.14 (m, 3H); 3.20˜2.60 (m, 5H); 2.16 (br, s, 1H); 1.67˜1.59 (m, 1H); 1.23˜1.10 (br, d, 6H); 0.82 (br, s, 3H). ¹³CNMR (CDCl₃): δ 177.6, 168.4, 133.6, 132.5, 131.7, 61.4, 57.7, 52.6, 52.1, 51.5, 50.6, 46.4, 46.0, 42.5, 42.0, 41.0, 27.9, 27.8, 21.2, 19.4, 14.1. M_(n): 2.1×10⁶, PDI: 1.9.

Poly(exo-5)₂₀₀ produced with PI-2: ¹HNMR (CDCl₃): δ 5.74-5.49 (m, 2H); 4.28˜4.13 (m, 3H); 3.27˜2.59 (m, 5H); 2.14 (br, s, 1H); 1.61˜1.56 (m, 1H); 1.23˜1.09 (br, d, 6H); 0.82 (br, s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (CDl₃): δ 177.6, 168.4, 133.6, 132.5, 131.5, 61.4, 57.7, 52.6, 52.3, 50.6, 46.6, 46.4, 45.9, 42.5, 41.9, 41.9, 27.9, 27.8, 21.2, 19.4, 14.1. M_(n): 4.4×10⁵, PDI: 2.45.

Poly(exo-6)₂₀₀ produced with PI-1: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.30 (m, 5H), 5.72˜5.48 (m, 2H), 4.58 (s, br, 2H), 3.25˜2.64 (m, 4H), 2.12˜2.07 (m, 1H), 1.6˜1.52 (m, 1H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃) δ 177.9, 136.0, 133.5, 131.8, 128.6, 127.9, 127.8, 53.0, 52.6, 52.2, 51.7, 51.0, 50.8, 46.0, 45.9, 45.6, 42.8, 42.2, 41.8, 40.9. M_(n): 8.8×10⁵, PDI: 1.92.

Poly(exo-6)₂₀₀ produced with PI-2: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.33˜7.22 (m, 5H), 5.74˜5.42 (m, 2H), 4.58˜4.48 (m, 2H), 3.02˜2.65 (m, 4H), 2.13˜2.11 (m, 1H), 1.56˜1.54 (m, 1H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃) δ 177.8, 136.0, 133.5, 131.7, 128.6, 127.9, 127.8, 53.0, 52.6, 52.2, 51.7, 51.0, 50.8, 46.0, 45.9, 45.6, 42.8, 42.2, 41.8, 40.9. M_(n): 8.8×10⁵, PDI: 2.0.

Poly(exo-7)₂₀₀ produced with PI-1: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.24 (s, br, 10H), 5.80˜5.54 (m, 2H), 5.13˜4.63 (m, 6H), 3.02 (m, 2H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 170.1, 135.3, 132.3, 131.3, 130.9, 128.4, 80.5, 66.8, 52.4 (m). M_(n): 2.6×10⁵, PDI: 3.7.

Poly(exo-7)₂₀₀ produced with PI-2: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.24 (s, br, 10H), 5.81˜5.55 (m, 2H), 5.11˜4.63 (m, 6H), 3.02 (m, 2H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃) δ 170.1, 135.3, 132.3, 131.3, 130.9, 128.4, 80.5, 66.8, 52.4 (m). M_(n): 4.5×10⁵, PDI: 4.5.

Poly(8)₂₀₀ produced with PI-1: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 5.37 (m, 2H), 1.97 (br, s, 4H), 1.2 (br, s, 8H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃) δ 129.6, 28.8, 25.7, 25.0. M_(n): 40000, PDI: 1.2.

Poly(8)₂₀₀ produced with PI-2: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 5.37 (m, 2H), 1.97 (br, s, 4H), 1.2 (br, s, 8H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃) δ 129.6, 28.8, 25.7, 25.0. M_(n): 49000, PDI: 1.29. 

1-7. (canceled)
 8. Latent photoactivatable precatalysts for metathesis polymerization, comprising: general formula: Ru(NHC)_(n)(X¹)_(m)(L)_(o) ^(p+)((X²)⁻)_(p) wherein: NHC is an N-heterocyclic carbene, n=1 or 2; X¹ is a C1-C₁₈ mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid or trifluoromethane sulfate; X² is a C1-C₁₈ mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid, trifluoromethane sulfate, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, or hexafluoroantimonate; m=0, 1 or 2 and L=a C₄-C₁₈ carbolic acid nitrile or a C₄-C₁₈ carbolic acid di- or trinitrile; and o=6−n−m or 5−n−m and p=2−m.
 9. The latent photoactivatable precatalysts for metathesis polymerization according to claim 8, wherein the general formula uses a 1,3-dimesitylimidazol-2-ylidene or a I,3-dimesitylimidazolin-2-ylidene and X¹═X²═CF₃COO, L=tert-butylnitrile, m=l, n=l, o=4 and p=l.
 10. The latent photoactivatable precatalysts for metathesis polymerization according to claim 8, further comprising cyclic olefins selected from the group consisting of norbornene, norbornadiene, cyclooctene, substituted norbornenes, substituted norbornadienes, substituted cyclooctenes, and substituted cyclobutenes.
 11. A method, which comprises the steps of: performing one of modifying surfaces and functionalizing surfaces with metathesis polymerization using latent photoactivatable precatalysts, the latent photoactivatable precatalysts for the metathesis polymerization, containing: a general formula: Ru(NHC)_(n)(X¹)_(m)(L)_(o) ^(p+)((X²)⁻)_(p) wherein: NHC is an N-heterocyclic carbene, n=1 or 2; X¹ is a C1-C₁₈ mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid or trifluoromethane sulfate; X² is a C1-C₁₈ mono or polyhalogenized carbolic acid, trifluoromethane sulfate, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, or hexafluoroantimonate; m=0, 1 or 2 and L=a C₄-C₁₈ carbolic acid nitrile or a C₄-C₁₈ carbolic acid di- or trinitrile; and o=6−n−m or 5−n−m and p=2−m.
 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein a polymer layer to be applied to a surface has a minimum thickness of up to 2 cm, the polymer layer being composed of at least one layer.
 13. The method according to claim 11, which further comprises converting the latent photoactivatable precatalysts to metathesis polymerization active catalysts by exposure to light radiation of a wave length of <350 nm in a presence of cyclic olefins.
 14. The method according to claim 11, wherein the metathesis polymerization is selected from the group consisting of a ring-opening metathesis polymerization and an acyclic diene metathesis polymerization.
 15. The method according to claim 12, wherein the polymer layer has a minimum thickness of up to 100 μm. 